To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In 2005, England witnessed 194,353 legal abortions, illustrating the significant role of abortion in reproductive health (Gornall, 2007). Abortion, defined as the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, has been a legal right in England since 1967, with restrictions up to 24 weeks and mandatory involvement of licensed medical professionals and the endorsement of two other doctors. The complexity of this procedure is magnified when considering doctors' moral objections, which can hinder access to abortion services. Notably, exceptions to the 24-week limit exist, such as when the pregnancy threatens the woman's life or in cases of severe fetal abnormalities (NHS, n.d.).
In stark contrast, Egypt enforces strict anti-abortion laws, with exceptions primarily for saving the woman's life. Despite this, illegal and unsafe abortions are rampant, as evidenced by a study in Upper Egypt where 416 out of 1025 women reported having undergone an abortion (Walker, 2004).
This essay delves into the multifaceted issue of abortion policies, exploring their social acceptance and legal limits in various countries, with a focus on England and Egypt.
4.9 (984)
“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”
The objective is to critically analyze these laws to determine which approach is more suitable, considering the legal, ethical, and societal implications of abortion.
The legalization of abortion is argued to be a necessity. If denied, individuals may resort to unsafe methods or face the challenge of raising a child in suboptimal conditions. Walker (2004) supports this argument, revealing that in Egypt, where abortion is largely illegal, a significant portion of women have attempted to terminate pregnancies. This highlights the risks associated with restrictive abortion laws, as women turn to dangerous alternatives.
Legalized abortion also serves as a preventive measure against teenage pregnancies, allowing young individuals to focus on personal development and economic contribution before embracing parenthood.
Rahman (2017) emphasizes the gravity of this issue, citing that approximately 47,000 women die annually from complications of unsafe abortions. This statistic underlines the dire consequences of restricting abortion access, particularly for those lacking the resources to properly raise a child.
Another crucial aspect is the consideration of pregnancies resulting from non-consensual sex. Forcing individuals to bear a child from such traumatic experiences can have long-lasting psychological impacts. Additionally, the recognition of contraceptive failure rates – condoms being only 98% effective, for instance – supports the argument for accessible abortion. It is argued that it's unjust to compel someone to bear a child when they have taken preventive measures. Furthermore, ethical implications of denying abortion in cases of rape or incest are significant, raising questions about bodily autonomy and the psychological well-being of the affected individuals.
The need for abortion varies widely based on individual circumstances, yet they collectively validate the support for England's abortion laws. They reflect an understanding of diverse situations and the importance of providing safe options for those in need.
Conversely, there is a strong opposition to the legalization of abortion. Critics, like Valenti (2018), argue that in many countries where abortion is legal in cases of rape, there is distrust towards women's truthfulness. This skepticism raises concerns about potential misuse of abortion laws. Valenti’s perspective, though modern, is controversial as it challenges the integrity of women's narratives in sensitive circumstances such as rape.
Alternative solutions like adoption are frequently proposed. Lowen (2019) highlights the viability of adoption, citing the presence of 1.5 million American families eager to adopt, thereby challenging the notion of 'unwanted' children. This viewpoint also resonates with religious and moral perspectives that equate abortion to murder, asserting that life begins at conception. Such beliefs emphasize the sanctity of life and the ethical dilemmas surrounding abortion.
The issue of teenage pregnancy is also tackled from a different angle. Opponents argue that minors who terminate pregnancies often face lifelong regrets, suggesting that the option of abortion should not be readily available to such inexperienced individuals. Additionally, the societal consequences of increasing children in foster care systems, due to the unavailability of abortion, are often overlooked. This leads to a complex debate about the best interests of both the unborn child and the potential parents, especially in cases where the parents are not ready or willing to raise a child.
Ethical considerations play a crucial role in the debate over abortion laws. One of the most contentious issues is the abortion of fetuses that might suffer from serious disabilities. Critics argue that this suggests a societal undervaluing of disabled lives, potentially leading to feelings of marginalization among the disabled community. The BBC (n.d.) notes the complexity of this issue, as the decision hinges on varying degrees of potential disability and the individual's ability to lead a fulfilling life.
Financial constraints also significantly impact abortion decisions. In many developing countries, the emphasis on traditional family structures limits women's autonomy in reproductive choices. The ethical debate over when life begins is central to these discussions, with varied opinions influencing abortion policies and individual choices.
Selective abortions, such as those based on gender or other non-medical reasons, are viewed as particularly unethical, raising concerns about the morality of 'designer babies'. This issue underscores the potential for abuse in abortion practices and the need to maintain ethical boundaries in reproductive choices.
From a scientific standpoint, the timing of abortions is critical. Studies show that most abortions occur at or before eight weeks, with over 91% happening before thirteen weeks (Ravitz, 2019). This aligns with public opinion, which often favors earlier abortion limits. For instance, a 2005 YouGov survey for the Daily Telegraph revealed that only 25% of respondents were content with the 24-week limit. This indicates a public inclination towards tightening legal timelines for abortion.
However, the emotional trauma associated with abortions, especially late-term, cannot be ignored. The psychological impact on women suggests a need for careful consideration in the decision-making process. Scientific advancements, such as improved viability of premature babies, also influence perspectives on when abortion should be permissible, raising questions about fetal rights and maternal responsibilities.
In conclusion, legalizing abortion is essential to a certain extent to avoid unsafe and unregulated abortion practices. Each case of abortion should be evaluated by professionals, providing guidance to those involved. However, the decision should ultimately rest with the individuals concerned, respecting their autonomy and personal circumstances.
Given the complexities surrounding abortion, the essay suggests that the legal limit for abortions should be reconsidered, potentially reducing it to 20 weeks. This aligns with evolving societal norms, medical advancements, and the need for ongoing review and adaptation of abortion laws. The analysis of sources and arguments presents England's abortion laws as more suitable, offering a balance of freedom, safety, and ethical considerations. These laws reflect a nuanced understanding of the diverse needs and situations faced by individuals considering abortion.
Ultimately, this essay underscores the importance of continuously adapting abortion policies to align with societal changes, medical advancements, and ethical considerations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of all parties involved are addressed in a comprehensive and compassionate manner.
Abortion Legalisation: A Cross-Country Examination. (2024, Jan 21). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/abortion-legalisation-a-cross-country-examination-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
